tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post8894696964359887182..comments2023-09-22T02:14:43.877-07:00Comments on Diastrophy: No interference……Please….Abhishek Agrawalhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03025811416106290940noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-73294012643017355582010-12-11T04:12:09.409-08:002010-12-11T04:12:09.409-08:00Agreed with you Kannan. Judiciary also doesn't...Agreed with you Kannan. Judiciary also doesn't have a completely clean image, as it has been spoiled lately by many events, and surely policy matters are the exclusive area of legislative but judiciary should always fill up the gap when nobody is listening......Abhishek Agrawalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03025811416106290940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-4398104690630922702010-12-11T04:05:57.746-08:002010-12-11T04:05:57.746-08:00hi abhishek, i agree with u to some extent. But, t...hi abhishek, i agree with u to some extent. But, this should not lead to "judicial-overactivism " as it might have some grave repurcussions. For example, if u cud remember, the SC judgement relating to shutting down of commercial complexes in Delhi had its own hidden agenda. Trespassing into executive's jurisdiction by the judiciary should not become a HABIT. Judicial activism is good only when sparingly used.Kannanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06904581586962273503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-23829343258774538362010-11-08T09:23:10.058-08:002010-11-08T09:23:10.058-08:00Right Vijay, but our consti has a provision that j...Right Vijay, but our consti has a provision that justice needs to be delivered by whichever means...so even if constitution is followed in spirit, judiciary is free to take on such matters...Abhishek Agrawalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03025811416106290940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-73575254422464786712010-11-02T14:48:47.692-07:002010-11-02T14:48:47.692-07:00if the judiciary is the gardian of the constitutio...if the judiciary is the gardian of the constitution, then who shall have to be the gardian for the common man?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01935230203891741610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-7984750709230865282010-10-06T05:21:22.293-07:002010-10-06T05:21:22.293-07:00Loved your post!Very imformative
Check my post and...Loved your post!Very imformative<br />Check my post and if you like something about it,vote for me in A Peep into effects of Phone In Your Life<br />http://umaspoembook.blogspot.com/2010/10/one-vote-counts.htmlUma Anandanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11529447615364043190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-72546740285664432702010-10-05T09:56:48.283-07:002010-10-05T09:56:48.283-07:00By the way, your posting is very informative :) Ke...By the way, your posting is very informative :) Keep writing your thoughts like that.Vishal Gehranahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14687409097632859107noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133343558068271352.post-85037471387767061272010-10-05T09:53:24.607-07:002010-10-05T09:53:24.607-07:00On the question whether judiciary has to interfere...On the question whether judiciary has to interfere in the policy making of government or not, the answer lies generally in negative. But we have not to forget this fact that both of the above institutions are under the Constitution, so the foremost spirit of the Indian Constitution has to be kept in mind. Under the Constitution, judiciary has been assigned roles, firstly, to act as a court of justice and to grant remedy in order of doing complete justice; secondly, to Decide the disputes between the parties concerned and lastly, to act as a guardian of the Constitution. Obviously, government has a discretion and plenary power to take policy decisions but that power also, like any other power, has to be exercised according to the spirit of Constitution. And when government omits to fulfil it's public duty envisaged by the Constitution, the judiciary has to interfere. PIL is only one of the way to make that duty enforceable. This is what we call Constitutionalism that is no other organ but the Constitution is supreme and the Constitutional spirit should prevail.Vishal Gehranahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14687409097632859107noreply@blogger.com